I was going to start doing some autoconf work, and noticed that
configure.in was executable. Then I noticed Makefile.in was executable.
o.O
So, I ran ```find . -type f -executable``` and found a bunch of files
that shouldn't be set executable.
This commit makes them normal files again.
Signed-off-by: Bryan Hundven <bryanhundven@gmail.com>
AM_PROG_LEX sets this for some weird reason; it should
look for a program only and not a library. Then later
it gets linked to ar, ranlib, dlltool, windres, windmc
and itbl-test despite nothing in the code #include'ing
FlexLexer.h
This isn't a big deal but it did cause a build failure
on Cygwin as it triggered a bug with their flex package
dependencies which I reported at:
https://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2015-10/msg00433.html
Arguably I should remove all traces of LIBLEX in each
Makefile.am instead?
Signed-off-by: Ray Donnelly <mingw.android@gmail.com>
pthread_mutextattr_settype -> pthread_mutexattr_settype
.. I'm not sure why this didn't fail everywhere, unless
no one has tried to build gold?
Signed-off-by: Ray Donnelly <mingw.android@gmail.com>
This change, as per #222, reduces the number of supported releases of
gcc to the latest branch releases.
I noticed while doing this work that gcc-4.5.4 was never added, so I
moved patches for gcc-4.5.3 to 4.5.4 and updated the
bfin-unknown-linux-uclibc example. Also, 120-siginfo.patch was fixed
upstream in the 4.5.4 release, so this patch is omitted.
I also bumped the avr sample to 4.9.3 from 4.9.2.
With the addition of gcc-5.x, the gcc release team now releases the
major.minor.0 versions, while updates to the branch are available in
svn/git. We'll address that when we get to issue #219. This change just
removes CC_GCC_5_1 and moves CC_GCC_5_2 to CC_GCC_5, and removes
CC_GCC_5_1_or_later and moves CC_GCC_5_2_or_later to CC_GCC_5_or_later.
This is the first of two part changes, as mentioned in #222.
This change is slated for release in 1.22.0. The next change will be
slated for 1.23.0, and will limit gcc versions to what is on
https://gcc.gnu.org under "Release Series and Status", which is
currently 4.9.3 and 5.2.0, although I will also support the previous
supported version. In this example that would be 4.8.5.
Last, but not least, this change also retires AVR32 support.
Signed-off-by: Bryan Hundven <bryanhundven@gmail.com>
Support binutils 2.25.1 in configuration.
Note: The patches do apply, but I didn't check the resulting tools.
Signed-off-by: Jasmin Jessich <jasmin@anw.at>
Distribution avr toolchains commonly add a patch to binutils' size to
enable a custom "-C" option that shows AVR memory usage.
This patch is specific to the AVR architecture.
In order to make the crosstool-ng AVR toolchain compatible with existing
distribution toolchains, this patch is necessary.
Signed-off-by: Erico Nunes <nunes.erico@gmail.com>
This updates the patches in 2.22 to 2.24.
Some removed as they were applied upstream.
Signed-off-by: Bryan Hundven <bryanhundven@gmail.com>
Message-Id: <9fb77800ae1d5f14cbf5.1393055637@Bryans-MacBook-Pro.local>
Patchwork-Id: 323130
For canadian cross to host i686-mingw32 fwd declaring
struct stat is not possible.
Instead #include <sys/stat.h>
Signed-off-by: Titus von Boxberg <titus@v9g.de>
Message-Id: <417a15d4277913841ddd.1353100974@tschetwerikow.boxberg.lan>
Patchwork-Id: 199733
Recently, all binutils versions have been renamed after a GPL compliance
issue was found and fixed in binutils;
http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2011-08/msg00198.html
Although legacy symlinks have been put in place, we should now use
the new, real version strings.
Signed-off-by: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr>
Recently, all binutils versions have been renamed after a GPL compliance
issue was found and fixed in binutils;
http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2011-08/msg00198.html
Old versions are no-longer available since the rename (eg. 2.19 has been
superseeded by 2.19.1, and only 2.19.1a was regenerated).
Remove now-missing versions.
Signed-off-by: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr>
The added code should be conditinal to the target system
being !MIPS, but is based on the host system being !MIPS.
This is plain wrong, and had not been noticed until now
as I never used those binutils versions on MIPS.
See:
http://sourceware.org/ml/crossgcc/2010-08/msg00192.html
Signed-off-by: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr>
This is a set of patches for binutils-2.20 that have been "ported", or rather
shamelessly stolen, from the OpenEmbedded project:
http://cgit.openembedded.org/cgit.cgi/openembedded/tree/recipes/binutils/binutils-2.20
Tried and tested on Arm (big-endian Xscale, and little-endian i.MX27) with GCC 4.4.2
Signed-off-by: Joachim Nilsson <jocke@vmlinux.org>
Fix filenames in patch files for binutils-2.20.
Some patch files were only usable with patch argument '-p0'.
Fix the diff context to match 2.20 release.
Signed-off-by: Frederic Roussel <fr.frasc@gmail.com>
- it is not necessary to use the gnu_hash section by default.
- renumber following patches
/trunk/patches/binutils/2.19/170-use-relro.patch | 14 14 0 0 ++++++++++++++
/trunk/patches/binutils/2.19/180-libiberty-pic.patch | 14 14 0 0 ++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 28 insertions(+)
Warning: the buildroot folks purposedly removed the skip-comment patch but didn't really said why. Keeping it for the sake of having it in svn just in case (removing it will be easier thant not having it at all).
You might just say: 'Yeah! crosstool-NG's got its own repo!".
Unfortunately, that's because the previous repo got damaged beyond repair and I had no backup.
That means I'm putting backups in place in the afternoon.
That also means we've lost history... :-(
Bryan Hundven